top of page
Search

Understanding the effect of shame on individuals with mental illness

Many individuals suffering from severe mental health are doubly affected. They battle the signs and handicaps arising from the illness on the one side. The assumptions and biases that emerge from misunderstandings around mental illness contradict them. On the other hand. Both have the potential to shape a quality of life: decent work, healthy accommodation, good health care and association with a diverse community of individuals. In the end, mental disease is being undermined. While study is becoming more detailed on the effects of the disease, stigma of mental illness was only recently began to be explained.


A lot of work also needs to be carried out to truly understand the nature and extent of risk to individuals with psychiatric disorders. Fortunately in other ethnic cultures, social scientists and sociologists have researched for decades phenomena linked to stigma. In this paper we combine mental stigma-specific studies with the more general stereotyping and discrimination research community to give a brief summary of the problems involved.

Public stigma is the response that the general population has to people with mental disease. The role of stigma is twofold. Self-stigma is the damage people have toward themselves for mental illness.





The prejudices, the racism and bigotry can be interpreted in terms of both public and self-stigma. Stereotypes by social psychologists are viewed by most members of a social community as highly powerful, social-kennt constructs. Stereotypes are known as "social" because they reflect socially co-ordinated notions of classes of individuals. They are "efficient" because people can easily create individual experiences and perceptions.


Comparing and contrasting the definitions of public stigma and self-stigma

Public stigma


Stereotype-Negative belief about a group (e.g., dangerousness, incompetence, character weakness)


Prejudice-Agreement with belief and/or negative emotional reaction (e.g., anger, fear)


Discrimination-Behavior response to prejudice (e.g., avoidance, withhold employment and housing opportunities, withhold help)


Self-stigma


Stereotype-Negative belief about the self (e.g., character weakness, incompetence)


Prejudice-Agreement with belief, negative emotional reaction (e.g., low self-esteem, low self-efficacy)


Discrimination-Behavior response to prejudice (e.g., fails to pursue work and housing opportunities)


The fact that most people are conscious of a variety of stereotypes does not suggest that they accept. Many individuals, for example, will remember stereotypes surrounding various race categories, but accept not that the stereotypes are real. In the other side of the matter individuals with disabilities support these stereotypical assumptions ("That's right; all persons with mental illness are violent!") and thus produce negative emotional responses ("They all scare me!"). Unlike ideologies, unhealthy attitudes have an evaluative (usually negative) aspect in comparison Emotional reactions to stigmatized communities often cause damage (i.e., frustration or fear).


Prejudice, which is basically a cognitive and affective response, contributes to bigotry and behavior. Prejudice which can lead to rage (e.g. physical damage to a minority group). Angry biases may lead to retention or substitution of psychiatric care by services offered by the criminal justice system with respect to mental health . Fear leads to avoidance; for example, employers don't want to hire people with mental wellbeing in their neighborhood. Prejudice to itself often leads to self-discrimination. Analysis shows that self-stigma and fear of failure from others drive many people to do little with life . For the others, the public and the self-stigma would be more created.





The general population of the Western world seems to be very much in favor of mental illness stigma. Studies have shown that the majority of US citizens and many western European nations have stigmatizing mental disease behaviors. Moreover, stigmatizing attitudes on mental wellbeing are not limited solely to the uninformed public; even well-trained clinicians from most disciplines adhere to mental health assumptions .In Asian and African nations, stigma is less visible , but it is uncertain if this result is a cultural sphere that does not encourage stigma or a lack of investigation.


Thus, public stigma improvement tactics is divided into three approaches: protest, communication and communication Groups are protesting against misleading and negative mental illness depictions as a means to combat the stigmas which they portray. Two messages are received through these efforts. To the media: avoid portraying mental illness inaccurately. To the public: PLAY pessimistic points of view on mental health. A researcher by the name of Wahl, thinks that people see much less shame and prejudices as a result of attempts to protest.


Anecdotal proofs suggest the effectiveness of protest behavior in eliminating stigmatic representations of mental illness. However, little observational evidence on the psychological effect on stigma and prejudice by protest movements provides an important avenue for future research. Protest is a reactive tactic that tries, but fails to inspire more optimistic attitudes, backed by evidence, to minimize negative attitudes towards mental illness.. Health offers information so that policy decision-making about mental disorders is better educated. Researchers have researched this approach to shifting stigma very closely. Analysis has, for example, shown that people who accept mental illness are less likely to promote stigma and prejudice.

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page